Trump Declares Deal Plan Is Not Ultimate Proposal as Officials Gather for Swiss Meeting
Ex-leader Trump stated this past weekend that the Moscow-drafted peace plan constituted "not my final offer", following fierce reaction from Ukraine's leaders and analysts that likened it to the Munich pact of 1938 between Neville Chamberlain and Hitler.
In brief remarks from the White House, Trump told reporters: "We’d like to get to peace. This should have occurred earlier … we are attempting to conclude it, one way or the other it must be resolved."
Upcoming Geneva Talks Include Multiple Countries
Ukrainian and American officials are scheduled to meet in Geneva on Sunday for discussions on this proposal. Security officials from France, Britain and Germany will also participate in the talks in Geneva.
Ahead of these discussions, US senators informed the press that State Department head Rubio contacted them during his travel to Switzerland for clarification on the details of this disclosed proposal. He said, this plan did not originate from the administration but instead a "wish list of the Russians", according to Senator Angus King, a member on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Zelenskyy Faces Critical Deadline
However, the former president has given Zelenskyy until Thursday to sign the 28-point document. It calls on Ukraine to give up territory it currently controls to Moscow, downsize the size of its army, and surrender advanced weaponry. It also rules out international peacekeepers and penalties for atrocities committed by Russia.
In a sombre address on Friday, the Ukrainian leader cautioned that Ukraine faces a difficult decision in the near future involving preserving its national dignity and losing a major partner like the United States. Zelenskyy acknowledged that it faces an extremely challenging period historically.
Ukraine's Negotiating Delegation Appointed for Upcoming Meetings
Speaking this weekend, the president said that genuine or respectable resolution was always based on assured safety and fairness. He announced a delegation, established through a decree, which will meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, led by his chief of staff Yermak.
Another member of the Ukrainian delegation, ex-defense head and national security council secretary Rustem Umerov, stated there would be consultations with Washington "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Hinting at limits, he noted: "Ukraine approaches this process with a clear understanding of its interests. This represents a continuation of recent discussions focused on harmonizing our plans for future actions."
Global Response and Concerns
Zelenskyy has attempted to engage constructively with a White House apparently intent to resolve the war on the Kremlin’s one-sided terms. He has emphasized that he will not surrender Ukraine’s sovereignty or abandon the constitutional framework that enshrines the country’s current borders.
During a summit held in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council issued a joint statement pushing back on the proposed deal, stating it requires "additional work". The statement indicated that EU and Nato members would need to be consulted on some of its provisions, that exclude Ukraine's NATO accession and impose terms on its future EU accession.
Public Opinion in Kyiv
Responses from Ukrainians to the proposal, prepared by Putin’s envoy and a US delegate, has been overwhelmingly hostile. Analysts argued it outlined a plan for further Russian aggression: targeting not just Ukraine but of other parts of Europe too.
Nayyem, a public figure involved in Ukraine’s 2014 pro-democracy Maidan revolution, said it drew comparisons with the Munich Agreement. The proposal belonged to a similar category, with the victim invited to outline its own surrender for broader convenience.
In a Facebook post, Nayyem said his anger by its "full" amnesty for Russian war crimes. This offended those who sought shelter in Bucha or Mariupol – sites of civilian executions – and families of deported children to Russian territory. "A rather cynical agreement," he stated.
Speaking in Kyiv’s Golden Gate metro station, Dmytro Sariskyi, 21, said that Russia had been trying to control Ukraine politically and territorially "for years". The agreement offered very little in the proposed deal and continued to keep its forces on Ukrainian soil. "I think the deal is an attempt to break Ukraine and force unjust conditions on us," he said.
If Zelenskyy signed off on the proposals it would be compelled to sacrifice its liberties, he added. If it didn’t, the US might cease collaboration and intelligence exchange, a vital resource of military intelligence for frontline Ukrainian troops. "There is no good way out of this for now," he remarked.
Varied Viewpoints from Ukrainian Citizens
A different commuter, teenager Sofia Barchan, said that the country would remain resilient without American support. "We will fight for as long as it takes. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. It belongs to Ukraine." She expressed that the president is intelligent and forecasted he would not give up Ukrainian land.
While speaking during rainfall, next to a replica of Kyiv’s original medieval gate, Ivanovna mentioned her appreciation to Trump for his peace-making efforts. She said that Ukraine ought to consider ceding certain regions for a limited time if it meant maintaining US support. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she said.
EU Leaders Criticize the Proposal
Former European heads of state have strongly criticized this proposal. Ex-PM of Finland Sanna Marin called it a catastrophe, not only for Ukraine and Ukrainians but for "all of the democratic world". She warned if the west showed weakness and ignorance – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – further hostilities could arise.
The former prime minister of Belgium, Verhofstadt, referenced a statement by Churchill of an appeaser as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He added: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. Another moment of truth for our [European] union."