🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, political analyst Michael Lange issued a significant forecast – not just who would win citywide, and block by block. Lange, an expert in elections born and raised in New York City, has spent over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity this year for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange has a flair for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the split between the progressive stronghold, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were adding approximately 200K ballots into the system every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: The candidate led the early vote by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, young, renters and people squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was gaining white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but his supporters was also motivated, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You predicted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to get over half. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, for example, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. So there was some opposition. But overall, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

There are areas with many non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the wealthy Jewish communities like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they favored Cuomo. And also, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore it’s unclear if existed major surprises here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in the US could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, tenancy is common and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.